Navigator Bench

Invoice, receipt & intent extraction · 4 models

Rankings are for one task type, volume, and budget. They are not a universal winner.

Comparison 65c072a8-816f-416c-9be6-7ef7256b9e70
Published
Methodology v1 · How scoring works
Funding visitor-key / video-demo
Models openai/gpt-4o-mini, google/gemini-2.5-flash, google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite, deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1
Candidate runs total: 0.00087508
Judge cost: not recorded
No grand total is shown.

Judge cost not recorded for these runs

Amounts are the exact stored decimal strings. No rounding is applied. candidate_cost_usd is the sum of measured run costs. judge_cost_usd is the sum of stored tier-2 judge ledger rows, or null when none were recorded. total_cost_usd equals candidate plus judge only when every candidate cost is present and a judge cost was recorded.

Candidate costs are the measured amounts on the receipts below (16 runs).

Stored runs

ModelTaskTierScoreLatencyMeasured costReceipt
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteInvoice field extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
770 ms0.00010725Run 4845e03f
google/gemini-2.5-flashInvoice field extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
778 ms0.0001797Run ac3734fc
openai/gpt-4o-miniInvoice field extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
713 ms0.0000411Run 8b98b1b5
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Invoice field extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
517 ms0.00006811Run 714996a4
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteReceipt total extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
536 ms0.00005125Run f4186251
openai/gpt-4o-miniReceipt total extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
494 ms0.00002115Run e398198c
google/gemini-2.5-flashReceipt total extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
728 ms0.0000908Run d5592418
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Receipt total extractionv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
331 ms0.00003541Run fc44553d
google/gemini-2.5-flashSupport intent classificationv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
483 ms0.0000169Run 9c50e1d9
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteSupport intent classificationv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
968 ms0.0000135Run 8e51fc6a
openai/gpt-4o-miniSupport intent classificationv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1171 ms0.00000855Run 4f68c95f
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Support intent classificationv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1291 ms0.0000186Run 9f9083ae
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteRepair broken JSONv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
537 ms0.00005675Run 29cd06d9
google/gemini-2.5-flashRepair broken JSONv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
525 ms0.0001009Run 596f347b
openai/gpt-4o-miniRepair broken JSONv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
747 ms0.00002595Run 4ea66be8
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Repair broken JSONv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
226 ms0.00003916Run 7d831ad1

Notable flags

No stored run in this comparison is flagged incomplete, mixed, or as an automated metadata check.

Measured cost vs quality

Scatter of stored measured cost against stored quality. Runs missing either number are omitted.

Fit for your inputs

Label: best_fit_for_inputs. The top rank is for this task, volume, and budget. It is not a universal winner. Methodology

Choose a task, volume, and budget to rank the stored runs for that task.

Exit presenter