Navigator Bench

Meeting notes & customer summaries · 4 models

Rankings are for one task type, volume, and budget. They are not a universal winner.

Comparison 7fb16500-712d-4e11-bcab-20a9d05e61e5
Published
Methodology v1 · How scoring works
Funding visitor-key / video-demo
Models openai/gpt-4o-mini, google/gemini-2.5-flash, google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite, deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1
Candidate runs total: 0.00178418
Judge cost: 0.0004657
Total (candidate + judge): 0.00224988

Amounts are the exact stored decimal strings. No rounding is applied. candidate_cost_usd is the sum of measured run costs. judge_cost_usd is the sum of stored tier-2 judge ledger rows, or null when none were recorded. total_cost_usd equals candidate plus judge only when every candidate cost is present and a judge cost was recorded.

Candidate costs are the measured amounts on the receipts below (16 runs).

Stored runs

ModelTaskTierScoreLatencyMeasured costReceipt
google/gemini-2.5-flashMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
474 ms0.0002295Run 09df9762
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
692 ms0.00013475Run efbf5b21
openai/gpt-4o-miniMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
568 ms0.0000519Run 602d9a84
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Meeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
178 ms0.00008441Run 49ea913a
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
532 ms0.0000855Run f078e9be
google/gemini-2.5-flashFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
918 ms0.0001148Run 2481d57d
openai/gpt-4o-miniFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
505 ms0.00004095Run a456fef7
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Five-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1976 ms0.0000601Run e4c47496
google/gemini-2.5-flashEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
468 ms0.0002474Run 961a8dc7
openai/gpt-4o-miniEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
427 ms0.00006765Run adebaa89
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
514 ms0.0001665Run af33314b
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Earnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
1069 ms0.00011562Run 1ec54c69
google/gemini-2.5-flashCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
656 ms0.0001547Run 9f12b9a0
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Customer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
186 ms0.00009955Run 2a09ac45
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
749 ms0.000104Run d26f4e7a
openai/gpt-4o-miniCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
1267 ms0.00002685Run c05c57fc

Notable flags

No stored run in this comparison is flagged incomplete, mixed, or as an automated metadata check.

Measured cost vs quality

Scatter of stored measured cost against stored quality. Runs missing either number are omitted.

Fit for your inputs

Label: best_fit_for_inputs. The top rank is for this task, volume, and budget. It is not a universal winner. Methodology

Choose a task, volume, and budget to rank the stored runs for that task.

Exit presenter