Navigator Bench

Summaries & writing · 4 models

Rankings are for one task type, volume, and budget. They are not a universal winner.

Comparison ba117668-cc71-417b-a676-1e982d874a8e
Published
Methodology v1 · How scoring works
Funding visitor-key / video-demo
Models openai/gpt-4o-mini, google/gemini-2.5-flash, google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite, deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1
Candidate runs total: 0.00181860
Judge cost: 0.0004669
Total (candidate + judge): 0.00228550

Amounts are the exact stored decimal strings. No rounding is applied. candidate_cost_usd is the sum of measured run costs. judge_cost_usd is the sum of stored tier-2 judge ledger rows, or null when none were recorded. total_cost_usd equals candidate plus judge only when every candidate cost is present and a judge cost was recorded.

Candidate costs are the measured amounts on the receipts below (16 runs).

Stored runs

ModelTaskTierScoreLatencyMeasured costReceipt
google/gemini-2.5-flashMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
580 ms0.0002295Run 3a2851ec
openai/gpt-4o-miniMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
482 ms0.0000519Run 198dc3a1
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteMeeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1019 ms0.00013475Run 1a65178d
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Meeting action itemsv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
531 ms0.00008417Run 58ade0b2
google/gemini-2.5-flashFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
721 ms0.0001148Run bd6ed3cc
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
988 ms0.0000855Run 01fbc12d
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Five-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1239 ms0.00005863Run 52f01466
openai/gpt-4o-miniFive-bullet briefv1Deterministic check
1Human spot checkMethodology
1060 ms0.00004095Run fa9c0387
google/gemini-2.5-flashEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
574 ms0.0002474Run 74a20a81
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
742 ms0.0001665Run e6c7f5ff
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Earnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
730 ms0.00020045Run 63f45176
openai/gpt-4o-miniEarnings call summaryv1LLM judge
5/5brevity 5 · coverage 5 · structure 5 · faithfulness 5Human spot checkMethodology
1193 ms0.00006525Run 51dff993
google/gemini-2.5-flashCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
472 ms0.0001547Run 7656aabb
google/gemini-3.1-flash-liteCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
648 ms0.000104Run aea93a18
openai/gpt-4o-miniCustomer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
674 ms0.00002685Run 6a7c2320
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1Customer changelog draftv1LLM judge
5/5clarity 5 · accuracy 5 · omissions 5 · audience_fit 5Human spot checkMethodology
1718 ms0.00005325Run 0e3ff8e9

Notable flags

No stored run in this comparison is flagged incomplete, mixed, or as an automated metadata check.

Measured cost vs quality

Scatter of stored measured cost against stored quality. Runs missing either number are omitted.

Fit for your inputs

Label: best_fit_for_inputs. The top rank is for this task, volume, and budget. It is not a universal winner. Methodology

Choose a task, volume, and budget to rank the stored runs for that task.

Exit presenter