Flowise vs Langflow

Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.

Flowise

Drag & drop UI to build your customized LLM flow

Langflow

A UI for LangChain to orchestrate language models and chains.

At a glance

Open SourceFree Tier
◌ Declining·From Freemium
Open SourceFree Tier
● Established·From Freemium

Overview

One-liner

Drag & drop UI to build your customized LLM flow

One-liner

A UI for LangChain to orchestrate language models and chains.

Maturity

Declining

Maturity

Established

Open source

✓ Yes

Open source

✓ Yes

Pricing

Free tier

✓ Available

Open source — free to use

Free tier

✓ Available

Starts at

Freemium

Starts at

Freemium

Model

Hybrid

Model

Flat rate

Enterprise

✕ None

Enterprise

✕ None

Best for

✓ Best for

Developers and non-technical builders who want to visually compose RAG pipelines, chatbots, and multi-agent systems

✓ Best for

Developers looking to quickly prototype and deploy AI applications using LangChain.
Data scientists who need an easy-to-use interface for orchestrating language models.
Teams that want a self-hosted solution with full control over their data.

Not ideal for

✕ Not for

Teams needing custom logic that goes beyond what the visual builder can express

✕ Not for

Projects requiring real-time streaming capabilities as it focuses on batch processing.
Users looking for cloud-managed services, as Langflow is primarily self-hosted.

Strengths

↑ Strengths

Visual flow builder
100+ integrations
RAG support
Multi-agent

↑ Strengths

Visual interface for building complex language model workflows.
Integration with LangChain for advanced AI orchestration.
Supports a wide range of language models and chains.
Self-hosted solution providing full control over data.

Weaknesses

↓ Weaknesses

Limited integrations with other AI frameworks and tools
Performance issues under heavy load

↓ Weaknesses

Limited integrations with other platforms and tools
Performance issues under heavy load
Full Flowise profile →Full Langflow profile →