Fly.io vs Render

Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.

Fly.io

Run your app close to your users

Render

Unified cloud for web services, static sites, databases, and cron — a Heroku successor.

At a glance

Free Tier
· Not enough data·From Freemium
Free TierEnterprise
● Established·From $7/mo

Overview

One-liner

Run your app close to your users

One-liner

Unified cloud for web services, static sites, databases, and cron — a Heroku successor.

Maturity

Not enough data

Maturity

Established

Open source

✕ No

Open source

✕ No

Pricing

Free tier

✓ Available

Free tier

✓ Available

Free static sites and limited free web services

Starts at

Freemium

Starts at

$7/mo

Model

Usage-based

Model

Usage-based

Enterprise

✕ None

Enterprise

✓ Available

Best for

✓ Best for

Developers needing global deployment, low-latency APIs, or running full-stack apps with persistent storage near users

✓ Best for

Full-stack apps needing backend + DBOne platform for services and Postgres
Heroku replacementsFamiliar PaaS with modern pricing

Not ideal for

✕ Not for

Teams that don't need multi-region deployment or prefer simpler Git-push workflows

✕ Not for

—

Strengths

↑ Strengths

30+ regions
Docker-based deploys
Anycast networking
Persistent volumes

↑ Strengths

Full-stack PaaS
Simple, predictable pricing
Easy Heroku migration

Weaknesses

↓ Weaknesses

—

↓ Weaknesses

Cold starts on free tier
Fewer global regions than hyperscalers
Full Fly.io profile →Full Render profile →