httpretty vs responses
Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.
httpretty
HTTP request mock tool for Python testing.
responses
A utility library for mocking out the requests Python library.
At a glance
Open SourceFree Tier
◌ Declining·From $0
Open SourceFree Tier
● Established·From $0
Overview
One-liner
One-liner
HTTP request mock tool for Python testing.
One-liner
A utility library for mocking out the requests Python library.
Maturity
Maturity
DecliningMaturity
EstablishedOpen source
Open source
✓ YesOpen source
✓ YesPricing
Free tier
Free tier
✓ AvailableOpen source — free to use
Free tier
✓ AvailableOpen source — free to use
Starts at
Starts at
$0
Starts at
$0
Model
Model
Flat rate
Model
Flat rate
Enterprise
Enterprise
✕ NoneEnterprise
✕ NoneBest for
✓ Best for
Developers who need to mock HTTP responses for testing Python applications.
Teams working on projects that rely heavily on API interactions and require isolated test environments.
✓ Best for
Developers who need to mock HTTP responses for testing purposes
Projects where internet connectivity is unreliable or unavailable during testing
Teams that require consistent and predictable test results without external dependencies
Not ideal for
✕ Not for
Projects that do not involve network requests or external APIs.
Applications where real-time data is critical, as httpretty mocks the response.
✕ Not for
Scenarios requiring real-time interaction with live APIs
Testing environments where network behavior needs to be accurately simulated
Strengths
↑ Strengths
Mock HTTP responses for testing purposes.
Supports various HTTP methods and headers.
Can be used with popular Python test frameworks.
↑ Strengths
Simplifies testing by mocking HTTP responses
Does not require an internet connection for tests
Easy to use with popular Python testing frameworks
Weaknesses
↓ Weaknesses
Limited language support
Complex setup for certain use cases
↓ Weaknesses
Limited documentation and examples for advanced use cases
Small community support and slow issue resolution