move-file vs fs-extra
Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.
move-file
Efficiently move files across devices with ease.
fs-extra
Extra methods for the `fs` module to simplify file system operations.
At a glance
Open SourceFree Tier
● Established·From $0
Open SourceFree Tier
● Established·From $0
Overview
One-liner
One-liner
Efficiently move files across devices with ease.
One-liner
Extra methods for the `fs` module to simplify file system operations.
Maturity
Maturity
EstablishedMaturity
EstablishedOpen source
Open source
✓ YesOpen source
✓ YesPricing
Free tier
Free tier
✓ AvailableOpen source — free to use
Free tier
✓ AvailableOpen source — free to use
Starts at
Starts at
$0
Starts at
$0
Model
Model
Flat rate
Model
Flat rate
Enterprise
Enterprise
✕ NoneEnterprise
✕ NoneBest for
✓ Best for
Developers automating tasks that require moving files across devices
Script authors needing a reliable method for file relocation in their projects
✓ Best for
Developers working on Node.js projects who need a robust set of file system utilities.
Teams that require additional safety features when manipulating files and directories.
Not ideal for
✕ Not for
Projects requiring real-time file synchronization
Use cases where manual intervention is preferred over automated solutions
✕ Not for
Projects requiring real-time file monitoring or streaming capabilities, as fs-extra focuses on batch operations.
Applications needing cloud-based storage solutions, as it is primarily for local file systems.
Strengths
↑ Strengths
Cross-device file movement
Simplified file relocation process
Reliable and efficient operation
↑ Strengths
Simplified file operations with additional methods like `copy`, `move`, and `ensureDir`.
Safe operations that prevent accidental overwrites or deletions.
Support for promises, making asynchronous file operations more manageable.
Weaknesses
↓ Weaknesses
Limited language support
Complex setup for cross-device operations
Poor documentation for advanced use cases
Performance issues with very large files
↓ Weaknesses
Limited advanced file system operations
No built-in support for streaming large files
Dependency on Node.js ecosystem
Community-driven development can lead to inconsistent updates