Tenuo vs Keycloak

Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.

Tenuo

Capability-based authorization for AI agents with task-scoped tokens and offline verification.

Keycloak

Open source identity and access management

At a glance

Open SourceFree Tier
○ Emerging·From $0
Open SourceFree Tier
● Established·From Free / Open Source

Overview

One-liner

Capability-based authorization for AI agents with task-scoped tokens and offline verification.

One-liner

Open source identity and access management

Maturity

Emerging

Maturity

Established

Open source

✓ Yes

Open source

✓ Yes

Pricing

Free tier

✓ Available

Open source — free to use

Free tier

✓ Available

Starts at

$0

Starts at

Free / Open Source

Model

Flat rate

Model

Flat rate

Enterprise

✕ None

Enterprise

✕ None

Best for

✓ Best for

Teams building secure AI applications who need robust authorization mechanisms
Projects requiring offline verification and proof-of-possession binding for AI agents

✓ Best for

Teams requiring fully self-hosted auth with SAML, OIDC, and user federation — especially in regulated industries

Not ideal for

✕ Not for

Scenarios where real-time online verification is required
Use cases that do not involve AI agent orchestration or require different security models

✕ Not for

Teams wanting managed auth with zero infrastructure overhead

Strengths

↑ Strengths

Capability-based authorization for AI agents
Task-scoped tokens with offline verification
Proof-of-possession binding
Native integration with LangChain/LangGraph

↑ Strengths

SSO
SAML 2.0
OpenID Connect
User federation

Weaknesses

↓ Weaknesses

Limited language support beyond Python
Small community and limited third-party integrations

↓ Weaknesses

—

Full Tenuo profile →Full Keycloak profile →