Yup vs Zod

Side-by-side — pricing, strengths, tradeoffs, and fit.

Yup

Object schema validation for JavaScript and TypeScript.

Zod

Zod

At a glance

Open SourceFree Tier
◌ Declining·From $0
· Not enough data·From Contact sales

Overview

One-liner

Object schema validation for JavaScript and TypeScript.

One-liner

Zod

Maturity

Declining

Maturity

Not enough data

Open source

✓ Yes

Open source

✕ No

Pricing

Free tier

✓ Available

Open source — free to use

Free tier

✕ None

Starts at

$0

Starts at

Contact sales

Model

Flat rate

Model

Flat rate

Enterprise

✕ None

Enterprise

✕ None

Best for

✓ Best for

Developers working on TypeScript projects who need robust data validation.
Teams building complex forms that require extensive input validation.
Projects where consistent and reliable data validation is critical.

✓ Best for

—

Not ideal for

✕ Not for

Scenarios requiring real-time data validation in a distributed system.
Applications with extremely high throughput where performance overhead matters.

✕ Not for

—

Strengths

↑ Strengths

Extensive validation methods for various data types.
Supports asynchronous validation and custom error messages.
Flexible schema definition with support for nested objects.

↑ Strengths

—

Weaknesses

↓ Weaknesses

Steep learning curve for new users
Limited documentation and examples
Frequent breaking changes between versions
Performance overhead for large datasets

↓ Weaknesses

Limited integrations with other TypeScript libraries
Performance overhead for large schemas
Steep learning curve due to advanced TypeScript features
Community support is still growing
Full Yup profile →Full Zod profile →